Dr. William L. Pierce - White race suicide
Is the White race committing suicide ?
The world that once belonged to us is now degenerating to the trends and destructive values we see all around us today.
Dr. William Pierce, Vidéos choisies
Out of the Darkness
Racialisme, eugénisme - Divers ouvrages
It wasn't just the german people who lost the second world war. It was all europeans, all white peoples, including americans. The jews were the only real winners of the war.
Ce ne fut pas seulement le peuple allemand qui perdis la seconde guerre mondiale. Ce fus tous les européens, tous les peuples blancs, y compris les américains. Les juifs furent les seuls véritables vainqueurs de la guerre.
The Dr. William L. Pierce - Aldebaran Video
The Dr. William L. Pierce - Audio collection
The Dr. William L. Pierce - Video collection
Dr. William L. Pierce, livres et articles en français
Dr. William L. Pierce, livres et articles en anglais
Pour plus d'informations
The History of everything
Petit article d'American Free Press (fondé et dirigé par Willis Carto) à propos de la banqueroute actuelle de la National Alliance, créée par William Pierce.
Ce dont peu de gens se souviennent est que la National Alliance est une émanation de la National Youth Alliance fondée par Willis Carto !
Rappelons qu'à l'époque du coup d'état de la clique de Mark Weber à l'Institute for Historical Review (fondé par Carto), Faurisson considérait Carto comme un vilain Nazi et prenait fait et cause pour Weber. Selon Mike Piper, un proche ami de Carto, il est fort probable que Faurisson considère encore Carto comme un ennemi. C'est probablement une des raisons pour lesquelles Faurisson, qui est parfaitement bilingue, évite de se manifester du côté du révisionnisme américain.
Lack of Leadership Is Blamed for Demise of Pro-White Group
• Members of National Alliance concerned about future viability
By Pete Papaherakles for American Free Press
The National Alliance (NA), once the best-financed and best-organized white nationalist organization of its kind in the United States, is now on the verge of extinction as NA headquarters in West Virginia are up for sale. Founded by Dr. William Pierce in 1974, NA membership in 2002, the year of Pierce’s untimely death, was estimated at 2,500, with an income of $1 million annually. By 2012 that number declined to less than 100, and today it is doubtful that even a handful of members remains.
The blame for the demise of the NA has been placed on Erich Gliebe, who became chairman in 2002 after Pierce’s death. Unlike Pierce, a physicist whose many books, lectures and lifelong dedication to the cause has inspired thousands, if not millions, Gliebe has been referred to by fellow members as uncharismatic, incompetent, a poor leader —and even a thief.
In an Aug. 12 interview with AFP, Jim Ring, the No. 2 man in the NA who resigned last October, explained :
“I resigned because I realized that Erich Gliebe is not only incompetent but he is also dishonest. He has put up for sale most of the National Alliance headquarters, the proceeds of which will go to him personally.”
Ring added that “unit coordinators like me and other leaders started resigning after the 2012 National Alliance Leadership Conference in October 2012 and most othermembers resigned after the reactivating of my website (www.NatAllNews.net) in January of this year.”
Gliebe reportedly stopped paying property taxes on some of the National Alliance headquarters property in 2012.
“The sad result is the demise and loss of the National Alliance headquarters that thousands of ex-members put their own sweat and hard-earned money into creating for what now appears to be all for naught,” said Ring.
Asking price for 289 acres and the Pierce Memorial Hall is nearly $700,000.
“With the sale of this acreage Gliebe will certainly sell off the remaining property shortly after and move the inventory to his suburban Cleveland home,” explained Ring. “Erich’s annual salary from the NA has gone from $65,000 in 2004 to $22,000 in 2012. But for the past few years Erich has held another full time job in Cleveland. He has also been pocketing donations and sales of whatever he could liquidate.”
Resistance Records, once a thriving music company acquired and built up by Pierce, had recording deals on both sides of the Atlantic and produced most of the NA’s income.
“Gliebe drove the company out of business through mismanagement (and) shady deals,” said Ring.
“The previous board appointed by Dr. Pierce had accused him of embezzlement. Erich even sold Dr. Pierce’s gun collection for personal gain, as well as having sold a sizable amount of timber from the property to a logging company for $38,000, keeping much of that money for himself.“
Of particular significance is a bequest worth anywhere from $160,000 to $1 million left to the NA by Robert McCorkill, a Canadian chemist and NA member who died in 2004. It included a collection of ancient Greek and Roman coins.
An injunction currently tying up this money in court could be lifted when the matter goes to trial on Sept. 10, at which point the NA may receive the bequest. Gliebe would have control over that money once the court rules.
Even Pierce’s own brother, Sanders Pierce, resigned from the NA on April 2013.
“I feel it necessary to explain my resignation from the organization my brother built in protest to Erich remaining as chairman,” he said, citing Gliebe’s “severe neglect” of NA business. “I simply feel he should turn over the chairmanship to someone who will devote full time to the National Alliance.”
Although Gliebe may have acted in an incompetent and unethical manner, it is unclear to what extent his actions have been illegal.
The NA board of directors consists of Gliebe, Jayne Cartwright and Ryan Miziarka.
All three are equally culpable for what is happening with the NA. Not only can Gliebe not do anything without the approval of the other two, but Ms. Cartwright and Miziarka can actually have Gliebe removed as chairman if they choose.
A March 30 post on www.NatAllNews.net stated that even after receiving dozens of letters of concern from NA members across the country both Cartwright and Miziarka have remained silent.
Above, the top man at the National Alliance (NA), Erich Gliebe, speaks at a conference in front of a painting of Dr.William Pierce, the founder of the +NA, which was actually an offshoot of Willis A. Carto’s National Youth Alliance organization+. Once a thriving white rights group with a cutting-edge magazine and a music-selling division, today the National Alliance is all but out of business.
PHOTO: NA WEBSITE
jewelry - 1945 lectures
Sciences - 121 lectures
Herbert M. Shelton - La santé sans médicaments
L'erreur fondamentale de la médecine
Si le nom du docteur Shelton suggère à lui seul une approche différente et nouvelle de la santé, le mouvement Hygiéniste dont il est le plus célèbre porte-parole et qui vit le jour au dix-neuvième siècle est malheureusement encore peu connu de nos jours.
Pourtant il ne s'agit pas d'une mode passagère et opportuniste. La voie hygiéniste ne propose pas de régime miracle, elle ne prétend pas guérir des maladies bien précises. Il faut savoir que la plupart des maladies sont des carences et des déficiences, en vitamines, enzymes ou minéraux (ce que la médecine officielle néglige effrontément, en traitant uniquement les réactions symptômatiques). C'est à ces carences que l'hygiénisme s attaque, car ils sont la cause de nombreux maux. Cela implique d'abord un reconditionnement total de l'organisme, une désintoxication, par le jeûne en priorité, mais aussi et surtout par une alimentation supérieure à base de fruits, de légumes, de céréales et de noix.
L'alimentation a en effet perdu son rôle physiologique primordial pour devenir uniquement un plaisir du palais, un produits de consommation pour qui la quantité et la variété valent plus que la qualité.
Ce livre est un vibrant réquisitoire contre les déviations de notre société qui se mettant au service des institutions, néglige celui de l'Homme, se tenant ainsi à la remorque de l argent, plutôt qu'à l'avant-garde d'un véritable progrès de l'humanité. La voie hygiéniste est celle que nous trace la nature : de la nutrition du bébé jusqu'à la préparation à l'hiver, il faut que l'organisme fonctionne, s'alimente, élimine et se protège, comme nous l'enseigne la nature dans les différentes manifestations de sa sagesse.
Herbert M. Shelton - Le Jeûne
Herbert M. Shelton - PDF
Herbalism - PDF
Herbert Macgolfin Shelton (6 octobre 1895 – 1985) fut un éducateur de santé aux États-Unis, végétarien et défenseur des régimes de nourriture basique. Il fut désigné par le Parti des végétariens américain pour concourir à la présidentielle des États-Unis en 1956.
Considéré comme le père des associations alimentaires, il a été le fondateur de l'hygiénisme, une médecine qui prône l'autoguérison, le crudivorisme, le jeûne et la naturopathie.
Après sa mort, ses successeurs continuèrent son œuvre qui continue à être propagée à travers le monde. Certains de ses livres, tel que Le Jeûne et Les Combinaisons alimentaires, sont devenus des classiques en naturopathie.
Spiritualité - 154 lectures
Michel Coquet - Pouvoirs spirituels et psychiques
Essai d'explication des miracles et pouvoirs paranormaux
Depuis la nuit des temps des êtres exceptionnels ont marqué les civilisations de leur empreinte. Hormis leur sagesse, ces sages, saints, yogis ou mahatmas ont manifesté des pouvoirs supranormaux étonnants (siddhi en sanskrit), transcendant le temps, l'espace et la matière. Qu'ils se nomment Bouddha ou Jésus, ils furent investis ou dotés de l'omniscience et de l'omniprésence. Pourvus du don de guérir, de l'éviter, de se rendre invisibles, de biloquer ou de connaître la pensée d'autrui, ils ont accompli de véritables miracles. Ce sont ces pouvoirs paranormaux que l'auteur a analysés en détail, dans le contexte spirituel plus vaste du dessein d'une âme incarnée. Il est temps que cette branche de la connaissance soit enfin libérée de ses fantasmes et superstition, dans le but précis de permettre au chercheur de vérité de mieux se connaître lui-même.
C. W. Leadbeater
Maitre Philippe de Lyon
Padre Pio Ou les prodiges du mysticisme
Padre Pio le stigmatisé
Reportages - 182 lectures
Dr. William L. Pierce PDF : Multilanguage - English - French
Dr. William L. Pierce Videos
The trouble with people
Many of our people who are attempting to recruit new members, or even to get a new person to come to one of our Sunday evening meetings have commented to me recently how very difficult it is. In the first place they find that people resist new ideas. Most people are pretty much in agreement with what their TV set has told them, and they don’t want to be told by someone else that their TV set has been lying to them.
That’s the largest category of people that we meet. But even those people who are wise to the lies of the controlled media are not easy to motivate. Some are afraid, even if they won’t admit it. They are afraid to say or do anything, including joining the Alliance, which may cause Big Brother to retaliate against them in some way. They’re afraid they’ll be fired from their jobs, or that their tax returns will be audited, or that something else unpleasant may happen to them. And then there are the slobs who are just plain selfish or lazy and who just don’t care. They agree with us, they say, but they can’t become members because they need that three dollars a month for other things — beer, cigarettes, clothes, new records for the hi-fi, or what have you. Or they can’t come to a meeting because they ordinarily bowl on Sunday nights, or they have to get up at six o’clock the next morning, or it’s too far to drive, or they’d miss their favorite TV program — or something.
Now when we talk to people like this, day after day, and most of the people that we talk to are like this, they fall into one of the categories I’ve just described. When we talk to so many people like this, it’s easy to become disillusioned, discouraged, and cynical — or, what’s just as bad, to retreat into hobbyism.
Well it’s a good thing to become disillusioned, to get rid of false expectations — but it’s very bad to become discouraged, or to become cynical, or to become a hobbyist — and by that I mean a right-wing gossip who subscribes to everything, joins everything, and, although he really believes nothing, he makes a great game out of pretending.
The reason that so many of us start off with illusions of easy success is that we tend to judge others by our selves. We expect other people to react the same way that we do to something which is so obviously true and right and exciting.
I remember the first political magazine (National Socialist World — Ed.) I published ten years ago. I printed and mailed out three thousand copies to individuals, to libraries, news agencies, some prominent right-wing politicians, and others. I thought I was dropping a real bomb which would shake up the whole world. I really expected that I would receive long distance telephone calls from hundreds of excited people and that at least a thousand subscriptions would come pouring in. And I also expected that the enemy would immediately begin harassing me and attempting to silence me. And when almost nothing happened I just couldn’t understand it.
No long distance calls, no Jewish harassment, no signs that my magazine had inflicted a mortal wound on the System. What I did receive was a hundred and twenty or a hundred and thirty subscriptions — or about one response from every twenty five persons who received my magazine. People older and wiser than I told me that I had done quite well to get even that much response.
I had judged others by myself. I had expected the people who received my magazine to read it and then to exclaim, “Ah! Here is truth. Here is righteousness. Here is wisdom. Here is beauty. The man who has dared to publish this has real courage. He has identified the enemy. He has suggested that we fight the enemy and he has offered us a creed to serve as a basis for our fight and for building a new society. Wonderful! I’ll do everything I can to help him and to join him in any way that I can.”
At least I had expected a lot more than one out of 25, a lot more than the four per cent. response that I got, to react in that way. And actually my real response was a lot less than four per cent., probably closer to, say, one quarter of one per cent., because most of the four per cent. who did subscribe were certainly “hobbyists” — people who were not interested in really fighting the enemy or in building a new world but only in amusing and titillating themselves, only in pretending to do something from the safety and comfort of their easy chairs, only in having something new and interesting to gossip about with their fellow hobbyists.
I had expected the world, in other words, to be idealistic — and I had run head on against the hard fact that it is not. I had found out the hard way that most people are incapable of recognizing the truth even when their faces are rubbed in it and that furthermore they are not really interested in knowing the truth even if they recognize it. They would just as soon stay with the lies that they have gotten accustomed to and are comfortable with.
I discovered also that people are almost incredibly timid and that they are selfish and materialistic as well, and that their only real concern in life is in pleasing themselves and in being safe and comfortable. In other words what our late Secretary of State, Earl Butz, said about Negroes and got fired for it, is not only true of Blacks but it’s also true of most Whites as well. So I lost my illusions. But instead of becoming discouraged or cynical I tried to understand what had happened, and I think it’s important for all of us to understand so that we don’t continue laboring under false ideas and don’t become discouraged when our expectations are not met.
Before we start looking at the shortcomings of our fellow citizens that we must take into account in our recruiting efforts, though, let’s remind ourselves of one very positive and encouraging fact — and that fact is that no matter how little people seem to be motivated by idealism, still the divine spark, the fire of God, is in them — because they are parts of the whole. No matter how much they are like the other animals on this Earth, like sheep, even like lumps of clay, they are still the highest embodiment of the Creator.
Men have dreamed great dreams and then worked and fought to make the dreams reality. Civilizations have been built. Mozart and Beethoven and Wagner did compose. Michelangelo and Leonardo and Rembrandt did paint. Shakespeare and Milton did write. Newton and Darwin did commune with the Creator and discover many of Nature’s mysteries. And great idealistic movements involving millions of people have arisen and transformed the whole world time after time.
So let’s always keep that in mind. Let us remember that no matter how much trouble we may have with people who will not or can not respond to our message in the way we would like them to, no matter what obstacles we must overcome, the force pushing us onward in our task is the eternal and irresistible Life Force symbolized by our rune. It’s the upward driving force of the Creator seeking self-completion and it cannot be stopped. The only question is whether we ourselves, you and I, will play a role in the things that are to come, or whether we won’t. Whether we’ll help the Life Force in the accomplishment of its task — or whether we’ll stand aside, or even get in the way.
So people are, we are, like many other parts of the Whole, animals — and animals are motivated primarily by instinct. They are programmed by the Creator to react in certain ways to certain situations. A dog or a rattlesnake or a tarantula or an eagle has relatively little to say about the way it will behave, the way it will conduct its life. Its instincts govern it — and the same is true of Man, with only a slight difference in degree.
Now men can reason and they can do idealistic or, let us say, unselfish things. But, as a matter of fact, so can many other animals. Anyone who’s ever owned a dog or a cat knows that they can reason — although not as finely as man. In the higher animals, at least dogs and cats and horses are capable of unselfish acts. Again, it’s a matter of degree — we’re all parts of one Whole, although we’re different parts.
We’ve made the mistake in the past of imagining that a great gulf separates Man from the rest of life, from the other animals. That Man is a reasoning, compassionate, idealistic creature — and that the other animals are not. Above all, we thought, Man reasons and the other animals don’t. Well now we’ve learned in the last few decades that the ability of non-human animals goes quite a bit beyond the sort of reasoning we can observe in our pet cats and dogs. Chimpanzees, for example, we know now, not only use tools but they also make tools. And they can be taught to communicate with men, using a language complete with rules of grammar, even though their vocal apparatus is not suited for human speech.
So the “great gulf” has disappeared and in its place we have a continuum, a continuously ascending hierarchy of life. The ability to reason and to do other things we once thought of as exclusively human is distributed along this continuum, and all we can say is that the ability becomes more pronounced, more refined, as we ascend through the various species toward Man, and then through the various races of Man, and finally through the various individuals who make up our own race. But just as we now must share our so-called human attribute of reason with other animals, so we share their attribute of instinct much more than we were formerly willing to admit. The fact is that although Man can reason, it’s instinct — inborn behavior which is pre-programmed by the Creator — which determines most of what we do on this Earth.
Some people, especially those who have been influenced by humanist ideas — that is, by the notion that human beings are somehow distinct and separate from the rest of the whole and are the possessors of something called “human dignity” which differentiates them from all other animals and also incidentally makes them all equal to each other regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, or sex — such people may find what I’ve said offensive. But that makes it no less true.
And it’s interesting to note that the principal propagandists for “human dignity” are the very ones who best understand the essentially instinctual basis of human behavior and who make the most use of that understanding. They are the skilled manipulators of mass behavior who use the news and entertainment media and all the techniques of Madison Avenue to assure that, on the average, we’ll think and vote and spend our money the way they want us to.
They manipulate our sexual instinct and our herd instinct, or instinct to conform to those around us, and our instinct for self-preservation — just about the same way that we use our knowledge of animal behavior to get our domesticated animals, our cattle, our sheep, our horses, to do what we want them to do. The only essential difference being that the Madison Avenue manipulators must use a considerably refined technique.
Consider, for example, herd instinct. That’s a simple name for a very complex phenomenon. It governs our behavior in many different ways, some of them quite obvious and direct, others much more subtle. It’s not reason but herd instinct which tells us to wear approximately the same type of clothes as the people around us; to read the same books; to cheer for the same team; to like the same music; and to pay lip service to approximately the same political, social, and religious ideas. A person doesn’t become a Baptist, or a Quaker, or a Catholic through a process of comparing these different sects and then making a rational decision as to which one is best — at least, 999 out of 1,000 people don’t do it that way. A person goes to the church he does because it’s the one the people around him, usually his immediate family, go to.
And herd instinct also plays a very important role in determining people’s attitudes towards things like racial integration and racial intermarriage. People will generally be for or against the things that their neighbors are for or against. Again, it’s not reason which determines their attitudes, not a calculated attempt to curry favor or to be popular by pretending to agree with one’s neighbors, at least not in the great majority of cases. One’s beliefs and attitudes genuinely change in order to stay in harmony with what one perceives to be the beliefs and attitudes of those around one — and it’s herd instinct which causes this change.
Now I don’t want to spend a lot of time tonight trying to analyze this phenomenon — it’s a complex and tricky subject with all sorts of complications. As just one example, people don’t usually remain among the same neighbors all their lives. They move from one part of the country to another to go away to school, to change jobs, and so on. And the attitudes acquired in one environment, that is among one particular group of neighbors, take a while to change when a person moves into a new environment, a new group of neighbors.
And since, because of all the moving around that we have today in this country, no environment, or at least very few environments, are really homogeneous anymore but instead consist of people from many different environments with, consequently, different attitudes, herd instinct has a little trouble in deciding just which shades of opinion to make a person conform to.
Furthermore there are often conflicting instincts at work simultaneously. Take racial integration, for example. We have on the one hand a natural xenophobia which tends to keep us from mixing with alien races — and on the other hand we have the influence of the manipulators using herd instinct to make us conform to their immediate projected goals of “integration” and forced equality. But despite the complexity of the instinctual control of our behavior we can make some general observations.
First, the dominant role of instinct in our lives is not, as the liberals would have us believe, something shameful, something to be overcome, something which, despite the fact that we share it with other animals, is somehow less than human. No, it’s simply the way things are — and, if we look at it the right way, then it’s pretty hard to criticize the Creator for it. If sex, for example, were a matter of reason instead of instinct, why then none of us would be here. Our race would be extinct, because long ago some nutty religion would have sprung up and declared sex “sinful” and told us that the only way to get into Heaven is to remain chaste. But no such religion has ever prevailed, though a number have tried, because our sexual instinct just wouldn’t stand for it. And to our xenophobia we also owe the very existence of our race. It’s what has kept us from mixing with non-White races long ago and, thereby, disappearing through the process of amalgamation. In fact, evolution could not take place at all if there were not an instinctive tendency of like to breed with like.
Our reason can easily be fooled — but our instincts, in general, are far, far wiser, far less fallible. When reason and instinct are in conflict it will generally be the instinct which is right. It’s our instincts which show us the way to the upward path — and our reason which must be used as a tool to help us in the direction pointed out to us by our instincts, rather than being used as a means of opposing these instincts.
But again we’re dealing with a complex and tricky subject and we have to be very careful about our conclusions. For instance, I just said that our instincts are usually right. But one of the ways in which we have been led astray has been through the artificial manipulation of those instincts. And in today’s unnatural society even we are obliged to buck some instincts — herd instincts for example — in our work to bring about certain changes which will allow a more natural play of our instincts and allow the Creator’s upward urge to again become predominant.
There is one firm and safe conclusion we can draw, however, and it’s this: Our efforts will be more effective — we’ll be more successful in recruiting new people — the more we are able to work with people’s instincts instead of against them. Now we are appealing to just one instinct. It’s the highest, the finest, the noblest instinct that we have — the Creator’s urge toward self-realization. But we cannot now also appeal to people’s cruder instincts, the instincts which, in most people, are the dominant ones. We cannot, at this time, offer people safety or popularity or wealth. All that we can offer them is an opportunity to make sacrifices, to undergo dangers and hardships, and to suffer social ostracism for the sake of the Creator’s purpose. And that means that our message will find a response only in a small minority of our people at this time. That makes things slow and difficult and often discouraging for us. But there’s no way around it — for a while yet.
The good aspect of this is that we’ll recruit only the spiritually best of our people — and those are the ones on whom we must build our foundation. But time is also important to us: We have two thresholds to cross which we discussed earlier, and we want to cross them as soon as we possibly can. And so we must be thinking now of the ways in which we can broaden our appeal in the future, and ways in which we can appeal to people’s other instincts in a natural and healthy way consistent with our purpose.
The most important of these ways is the building of a genuine organic community. When we have not just a collection of people paying their dues each month to the Alliance, but a real community of men and women and children living together, working together, and sacrificing together for our common purpose, our shared purpose — then we will have come a long way. And it need not be an especially large community. What’s more important than numbers is the sense of community, the feeling of community. When we have that then we can put our own herd instinct to work — and it will be a much more powerful, more compelling herd instinct than that which the enemy is now manipulating; because the enemy, in order to accomplish his destructive purpose, had first to set about breaking down and undermining the already-existing sense of community in America. Before he could begin employing herd instinct to promote racial mixing, he had to destroy the basis on which herd instinct had formerly opposed that mixing. He had to destroy White solidarity. He had to turn a national and racial community into an atomized mass of individuals, and that’s exactly what he’s done.
I doubt that anyone here feels a sense of belonging to Arlington, Virginia, say, as a community — or to Washington, or Falls Church, or Silver Spring, or wherever you happen to live. That disappeared years ago, decades ago, in America — and people miss it. There are, I’m sure, a few neighborhoods left in America, ethnic neighborhoods, racially homogeneous neighborhoods — South Boston, perhaps a few other places — but the seeds of their destruction have already been sown and are growing fast. And the same is true of nearly all the various Christian churches, all the other social entities which used to provide for people the feeling of community which their souls crave. And so it will be of enormous importance to us when we have in the Alliance a real community and can offer to soul-sick Americans the sense of security, of companionship, of moral reinforcement which only belonging to an organic community can provide.
That’s what we can look forward to and that’s what we must work for now. When we have it, then we’ll not be obliged so much to buck people’s instincts — and our recruiting efforts will certainly be much, much more effective. But for now we still have to do things the hard way — and it will be slow and difficult for a while yet, and all I can say to you is that we must continue building our own consciousness and thus our strength in the ways that I’ve told you about, and we must concentrate our efforts on person-to-person recruiting — each of us, every day, in the way that I talked to you about a couple of weeks ago. And then we will have a community, and we will cross our two thresholds, and our truth will prevail.
November 7, 1976
Listen to the audio recording of this speech :
Les Carnets de Turner
Who we Are
Pensées sur le 4 juillet
Le port d’armes en Allemagne, 1928-1945
La mesure de la grandeur
Out of the Darkness
Vision of a future world
Le féminisme : le grand destructeur
Ovni, Ufologie - 202 lectures
Pablo Santa Cruz de la Vega - Proyecto OVNIS 2 Parte
La otra cara de los alienigenas
Porque la realidad siempre supera a la ficcion
Si los Alienígenas están presentes desde el origen mismo de la Humanidad tal como la conocemos, entonces son operadores de este Sistema Macrocósmico con algún fin que debemos desentrañar, ya que de lo contrario, estamos sujetos a interactuar en las condiciones más extremas de dolor y sufrimiento, en un Experimento Psicogenético de gran envergadura del cual somos totalmente inconscientes a la manera de unas simples cobayas de laboratorio.
Así mismo, si dos millones de alemanes fueron evacuados a una Base Intraterrena en la Antártida, fuera del campo de acción de este colosal Experimento Psicogenético, quedando libres de las dependencias humanas y la influencia de los designios demiúrgicos, entonces, ¿Podemos acceder nosotros a la misma posibilidad, escapando de los ciclos de vida y muerte en la materia? Ésta, sin lugar a dudas, es una pregunta muy importante.
Pablo Santa Cruz de la Vega - Proyecto OVNIS
La base Antártica
Xentinels - Proyecto Ovnis
Histoire - 309 lectures
Découvrez l'interview exclusive de Patrice Pooyard le réalisateur du documentaire La Révélation des Pyramides. Il vient sur BTLV présenter son nouveau livre/DVD GIZEH 2005 et nous parler de la suite de La révélation des Pyramides.
La révélation des Pyramides
Patrice Pooyard entrevue sur BTLV
Bob Vous Dit Toute La Vérité - Chaine Youtube
Découvrez l'interview exclusive de Patrice Pooyard le réalisateur du documentaire La Révélation des Pyramides. Il vient sur BTLV présenter son nouveau livre/DVD "GIZEH 2005" et nous parler de la suite de La révélation des Pyramides.
Jacques Grimault - Patrice Pooyard - Gizeh 2005
Jacques Grimault - Les OVNI dans le système solaire - Observations et conclusions
Jacques Grimault - Une histoire cyclo-cosmique du monde
Jacques Grimault - La révélation des pyramides et autres secrets
Conférences, témoignages - 195 lectures
Baldur von Schirach - Yo creí en Hitler
Baldur von Schirach es indudablemente, junto con Rudolf Hess, el superviviente más caracterizado de la época nazi. Militante desde los primeros tiempos alcanzó un puesto preeminente en la jerarquía nacionalsocialista como Jefe de las Juventudes Hitlerianas, y más tarde, ya durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial, como gauleiter de Viena. Condenado a veinte años de reclusión por el Tribunal de Nuremberg y cumplida esta sentencia en la cárcel de Spandau, Baldur von Schirach ha recobrado recientemente su libertad, reintegrándose a la comunidad alemana.
Actor y testigo excepcional del auge y caída del Nacionalsocialismo, hombre de notable valía y conocedor personal de las más importantes personalidades del Tercer Reich, así como de acontecimientos cubiertos hasta ahora de un impenetrable secreto, Baldur von Schirach nos relata en este libro sus apasionantes Memorias. En ellas se muestran al desnudo, con sus cualidades y sus errores, las características de un movimiento político que estuvo a punto de dominar el mundo y que después de elevar a Alemania hasta la cima de su poderío, la hundió en la más espantosa de las catástrofes.
Acogidas en todo el mundo con inusitada expectación, motivo de las más aceradas polémicas, estas Memorias constituyen uno de los documentos esenciales para conocer la agitada historia de nuestro siglo.
Baldur von Schirach - PDF
Spiritualité - 202 lectures
Barbara Ann Brennan - Le pouvoir bénéfique des mains
Comment se soigner par les champs énergétiques
Un nouveau guide pour l’être humain : sa santé, ses relations humaines et la maladie
Le corps humain est environné par un champ d'énergie (aura) à travers lequel nous faisons l'expérience de la réalité, de la santé et de la maladie. C'est en contrôlant ce champ d'énergie que nous avons la possibilité d'agir sur nous-mêmes et de nous guérir.
Il ne s'agit pas ici simplement d'un guide concernant les techniques du magnétisme.
L'auteur est, en effet, soucieuse de relier sa méthode au contexte scientifique (elle a une formation de physicienne) de la culture occidentale.
Elle situe sa pratique dans le cadre plus large d'une recherche spirituelle, d'une quête - au-delà de la santé - de l'harmonie et du bonheur.
C'est aussi le témoignage d'une praticienne qui a plus de quinze ans d'expérience professionnelle.
L'auteur : Barbara Ann Brennan est guérisseur et psychothérapeute. Elle a travaillé à la NASA (au Goddard Space Flight Center) où elle a achevé sa thèse de physique atmosphérique.
Elle a étudié les champs d'énergie humaine et a collaboré à divers programmes de recherche avec l'Université Drexel et l'institute for the New Age.
L’amour est le visage et le corps de l’Univers, son tissu conjonctif, l’étoffe dont nous sommes tissés, l’expérience de la totalité de son être et la connexion à la Divinité universelle.
Toute souffrance résulte de l’illusion de la séparation, génératrice de peur, de haine de soi-même et éventuellement de maladie.
Vous êtes maître de votre vie. Vous pouvez la dominer beaucoup mieux que vous ne le supposez. Vous pouvez très bien vous guérir vous-même d’une maladie en phase terminale.
La seule maladie réellement « terminale » est la condition humaine. Mais l’existence n’a rien de terminal et la mort n’est qu’un simple passage à un autre niveau d’existence.
Je voudrais vous inciter à franchir les limites de votre vie, à vous considérer d’un regard différent, à vivre sur le fil tranchant du temps et à vous autoriser à naître à une nouvelle vie à chaque minute de votre existence.
J ’aimerais vous encourager à dépoussiérer quelque peu le moule de votre expérience de vie.
Médecine - PDF
jewelry - 222 lectures
La présidente de l’Argentine invoque Shylock - Le Gentil
La présidente de l’Argentine dit qu’il faut lire « Le marchand de Venise » de Shakespeare pour comprendre le problème des fonds vautours
À ceux qui ont cru qu’elle rigolait, elle a répondu que ce n’était pas de l’humour, car « l’usure et les suceurs de sang » ont été immortalisés dans les plus grands chefs d’œuvre de la littérature. ...
Elle a parfaitement compris le problème des « Shylock »…
Les juifs hurlent à l’antisémitisme !
Le Gentil - L'Observateur du péril innommable
Histoire - 188 lectures
Frances Mossiker - The Queen's necklace
The Affair of the Diamond Necklace was an incident in the 1780s at the court of Louis XVI of France involving his wife, Queen Marie Antoinette. The reputation of the Queen, which was already tarnished by gossip, was ruined by the implication that she had participated in a crime to defraud the crown jewellers of the cost of a very expensive diamond necklace. The Affair was historically significant as one of the events that led to the French populace's disillusionment with the monarchy, which, among other causes, eventually culminated in the French Revolution.
The diamond necklace was commissioned by Louis XV for his mistress, Madame du Barry. At the death of the King, the necklace was unpaid for, almost bankrupting the jewellers and leading to various unsuccessful schemes to secure a sale to Queen Marie-Antoinette.
« billets précédents - page 1 de 165