WAWA CONSPI

Dr. William L. Pierce PDF : Multilanguage - English - French
Dr. William L. Pierce Videos


The trouble with people

Many of our people who are attempting to recruit new members, or even to get a new person to come to one of our Sunday evening meetings have commented to me recently how very difficult it is. In the first place they find that people resist new ideas. Most people are pretty much in agreement with what their TV set has told them, and they don’t want to be told by someone else that their TV set has been lying to them.


That’s the largest category of people that we meet. But even those people who are wise to the lies of the controlled media are not easy to motivate. Some are afraid, even if they won’t admit it. They are afraid to say or do anything, including joining the Alliance, which may cause Big Brother to retaliate against them in some way. They’re afraid they’ll be fired from their jobs, or that their tax returns will be audited, or that something else unpleasant may happen to them. And then there are the slobs who are just plain selfish or lazy and who just don’t care. They agree with us, they say, but they can’t become members because they need that three dollars a month for other things — beer, cigarettes, clothes, new records for the hi-fi, or what have you. Or they can’t come to a meeting because they ordinarily bowl on Sunday nights, or they have to get up at six o’clock the next morning, or it’s too far to drive, or they’d miss their favorite TV program — or something.

Now when we talk to people like this, day after day, and most of the people that we talk to are like this, they fall into one of the categories I’ve just described. When we talk to so many people like this, it’s easy to become disillusioned, discouraged, and cynical — or, what’s just as bad, to retreat into hobbyism.

Well it’s a good thing to become disillusioned, to get rid of false expectations — but it’s very bad to become discouraged, or to become cynical, or to become a hobbyist — and by that I mean a right-wing gossip who subscribes to everything, joins everything, and, although he really believes nothing, he makes a great game out of pretending.

The reason that so many of us start off with illusions of easy success is that we tend to judge others by our selves. We expect other people to react the same way that we do to something which is so obviously true and right and exciting.

I remember the first political magazine (National Socialist World — Ed.) I published ten years ago. I printed and mailed out three thousand copies to individuals, to libraries, news agencies, some prominent right-wing politicians, and others. I thought I was dropping a real bomb which would shake up the whole world. I really expected that I would receive long distance telephone calls from hundreds of excited people and that at least a thousand subscriptions would come pouring in. And I also expected that the enemy would immediately begin harassing me and attempting to silence me. And when almost nothing happened I just couldn’t understand it.

No long distance calls, no Jewish harassment, no signs that my magazine had inflicted a mortal wound on the System. What I did receive was a hundred and twenty or a hundred and thirty subscriptions — or about one response from every twenty five persons who received my magazine. People older and wiser than I told me that I had done quite well to get even that much response.

I had judged others by myself. I had expected the people who received my magazine to read it and then to exclaim, “Ah! Here is truth. Here is righteousness. Here is wisdom. Here is beauty. The man who has dared to publish this has real courage. He has identified the enemy. He has suggested that we fight the enemy and he has offered us a creed to serve as a basis for our fight and for building a new society. Wonderful! I’ll do everything I can to help him and to join him in any way that I can.”

At least I had expected a lot more than one out of 25, a lot more than the four per cent. response that I got, to react in that way. And actually my real response was a lot less than four per cent., probably closer to, say, one quarter of one per cent., because most of the four per cent. who did subscribe were certainly “hobbyists” — people who were not interested in really fighting the enemy or in building a new world but only in amusing and titillating themselves, only in pretending to do something from the safety and comfort of their easy chairs, only in having something new and interesting to gossip about with their fellow hobbyists.

I had expected the world, in other words, to be idealistic — and I had run head on against the hard fact that it is not. I had found out the hard way that most people are incapable of recognizing the truth even when their faces are rubbed in it and that furthermore they are not really interested in knowing the truth even if they recognize it. They would just as soon stay with the lies that they have gotten accustomed to and are comfortable with.

I discovered also that people are almost incredibly timid and that they are selfish and materialistic as well, and that their only real concern in life is in pleasing themselves and in being safe and comfortable. In other words what our late Secretary of State, Earl Butz, said about Negroes and got fired for it, is not only true of Blacks but it’s also true of most Whites as well. So I lost my illusions. But instead of becoming discouraged or cynical I tried to understand what had happened, and I think it’s important for all of us to understand so that we don’t continue laboring under false ideas and don’t become discouraged when our expectations are not met.

Before we start looking at the shortcomings of our fellow citizens that we must take into account in our recruiting efforts, though, let’s remind ourselves of one very positive and encouraging fact — and that fact is that no matter how little people seem to be motivated by idealism, still the divine spark, the fire of God, is in them — because they are parts of the whole. No matter how much they are like the other animals on this Earth, like sheep, even like lumps of clay, they are still the highest embodiment of the Creator.

Men have dreamed great dreams and then worked and fought to make the dreams reality. Civilizations have been built. Mozart and Beethoven and Wagner did compose. Michelangelo and Leonardo and Rembrandt did paint. Shakespeare and Milton did write. Newton and Darwin did commune with the Creator and discover many of Nature’s mysteries. And great idealistic movements involving millions of people have arisen and transformed the whole world time after time.

So let’s always keep that in mind. Let us remember that no matter how much trouble we may have with people who will not or can not respond to our message in the way we would like them to, no matter what obstacles we must overcome, the force pushing us onward in our task is the eternal and irresistible Life Force symbolized by our rune. It’s the upward driving force of the Creator seeking self-completion and it cannot be stopped. The only question is whether we ourselves, you and I, will play a role in the things that are to come, or whether we won’t. Whether we’ll help the Life Force in the accomplishment of its task — or whether we’ll stand aside, or even get in the way.

So people are, we are, like many other parts of the Whole, animals — and animals are motivated primarily by instinct. They are programmed by the Creator to react in certain ways to certain situations. A dog or a rattlesnake or a tarantula or an eagle has relatively little to say about the way it will behave, the way it will conduct its life. Its instincts govern it — and the same is true of Man, with only a slight difference in degree.

Now men can reason and they can do idealistic or, let us say, unselfish things. But, as a matter of fact, so can many other animals. Anyone who’s ever owned a dog or a cat knows that they can reason — although not as finely as man. In the higher animals, at least dogs and cats and horses are capable of unselfish acts. Again, it’s a matter of degree — we’re all parts of one Whole, although we’re different parts.

We’ve made the mistake in the past of imagining that a great gulf separates Man from the rest of life, from the other animals. That Man is a reasoning, compassionate, idealistic creature — and that the other animals are not. Above all, we thought, Man reasons and the other animals don’t. Well now we’ve learned in the last few decades that the ability of non-human animals goes quite a bit beyond the sort of reasoning we can observe in our pet cats and dogs. Chimpanzees, for example, we know now, not only use tools but they also make tools. And they can be taught to communicate with men, using a language complete with rules of grammar, even though their vocal apparatus is not suited for human speech.

So the “great gulf” has disappeared and in its place we have a continuum, a continuously ascending hierarchy of life. The ability to reason and to do other things we once thought of as exclusively human is distributed along this continuum, and all we can say is that the ability becomes more pronounced, more refined, as we ascend through the various species toward Man, and then through the various races of Man, and finally through the various individuals who make up our own race. But just as we now must share our so-called human attribute of reason with other animals, so we share their attribute of instinct much more than we were formerly willing to admit. The fact is that although Man can reason, it’s instinct — inborn behavior which is pre-programmed by the Creator — which determines most of what we do on this Earth.

Some people, especially those who have been influenced by humanist ideas — that is, by the notion that human beings are somehow distinct and separate from the rest of the whole and are the possessors of something called “human dignity” which differentiates them from all other animals and also incidentally makes them all equal to each other regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, or sex — such people may find what I’ve said offensive. But that makes it no less true.

And it’s interesting to note that the principal propagandists for “human dignity” are the very ones who best understand the essentially instinctual basis of human behavior and who make the most use of that understanding. They are the skilled manipulators of mass behavior who use the news and entertainment media and all the techniques of Madison Avenue to assure that, on the average, we’ll think and vote and spend our money the way they want us to.

They manipulate our sexual instinct and our herd instinct, or instinct to conform to those around us, and our instinct for self-preservation — just about the same way that we use our knowledge of animal behavior to get our domesticated animals, our cattle, our sheep, our horses, to do what we want them to do. The only essential difference being that the Madison Avenue manipulators must use a considerably refined technique.

Consider, for example, herd instinct. That’s a simple name for a very complex phenomenon. It governs our behavior in many different ways, some of them quite obvious and direct, others much more subtle. It’s not reason but herd instinct which tells us to wear approximately the same type of clothes as the people around us; to read the same books; to cheer for the same team; to like the same music; and to pay lip service to approximately the same political, social, and religious ideas. A person doesn’t become a Baptist, or a Quaker, or a Catholic through a process of comparing these different sects and then making a rational decision as to which one is best — at least, 999 out of 1,000 people don’t do it that way. A person goes to the church he does because it’s the one the people around him, usually his immediate family, go to.

And herd instinct also plays a very important role in determining people’s attitudes towards things like racial integration and racial intermarriage. People will generally be for or against the things that their neighbors are for or against. Again, it’s not reason which determines their attitudes, not a calculated attempt to curry favor or to be popular by pretending to agree with one’s neighbors, at least not in the great majority of cases. One’s beliefs and attitudes genuinely change in order to stay in harmony with what one perceives to be the beliefs and attitudes of those around one — and it’s herd instinct which causes this change.

Now I don’t want to spend a lot of time tonight trying to analyze this phenomenon — it’s a complex and tricky subject with all sorts of complications. As just one example, people don’t usually remain among the same neighbors all their lives. They move from one part of the country to another to go away to school, to change jobs, and so on. And the attitudes acquired in one environment, that is among one particular group of neighbors, take a while to change when a person moves into a new environment, a new group of neighbors.

And since, because of all the moving around that we have today in this country, no environment, or at least very few environments, are really homogeneous anymore but instead consist of people from many different environments with, consequently, different attitudes, herd instinct has a little trouble in deciding just which shades of opinion to make a person conform to.

Furthermore there are often conflicting instincts at work simultaneously. Take racial integration, for example. We have on the one hand a natural xenophobia which tends to keep us from mixing with alien races — and on the other hand we have the influence of the manipulators using herd instinct to make us conform to their immediate projected goals of “integration” and forced equality. But despite the complexity of the instinctual control of our behavior we can make some general observations.

First, the dominant role of instinct in our lives is not, as the liberals would have us believe, something shameful, something to be overcome, something which, despite the fact that we share it with other animals, is somehow less than human. No, it’s simply the way things are — and, if we look at it the right way, then it’s pretty hard to criticize the Creator for it. If sex, for example, were a matter of reason instead of instinct, why then none of us would be here. Our race would be extinct, because long ago some nutty religion would have sprung up and declared sex “sinful” and told us that the only way to get into Heaven is to remain chaste. But no such religion has ever prevailed, though a number have tried, because our sexual instinct just wouldn’t stand for it. And to our xenophobia we also owe the very existence of our race. It’s what has kept us from mixing with non-White races long ago and, thereby, disappearing through the process of amalgamation. In fact, evolution could not take place at all if there were not an instinctive tendency of like to breed with like.

Our reason can easily be fooled — but our instincts, in general, are far, far wiser, far less fallible. When reason and instinct are in conflict it will generally be the instinct which is right. It’s our instincts which show us the way to the upward path — and our reason which must be used as a tool to help us in the direction pointed out to us by our instincts, rather than being used as a means of opposing these instincts.

But again we’re dealing with a complex and tricky subject and we have to be very careful about our conclusions. For instance, I just said that our instincts are usually right. But one of the ways in which we have been led astray has been through the artificial manipulation of those instincts. And in today’s unnatural society even we are obliged to buck some instincts — herd instincts for example — in our work to bring about certain changes which will allow a more natural play of our instincts and allow the Creator’s upward urge to again become predominant.

There is one firm and safe conclusion we can draw, however, and it’s this: Our efforts will be more effective — we’ll be more successful in recruiting new people — the more we are able to work with people’s instincts instead of against them. Now we are appealing to just one instinct. It’s the highest, the finest, the noblest instinct that we have — the Creator’s urge toward self-realization. But we cannot now also appeal to people’s cruder instincts, the instincts which, in most people, are the dominant ones. We cannot, at this time, offer people safety or popularity or wealth. All that we can offer them is an opportunity to make sacrifices, to undergo dangers and hardships, and to suffer social ostracism for the sake of the Creator’s purpose. And that means that our message will find a response only in a small minority of our people at this time. That makes things slow and difficult and often discouraging for us. But there’s no way around it — for a while yet.

The good aspect of this is that we’ll recruit only the spiritually best of our people — and those are the ones on whom we must build our foundation. But time is also important to us: We have two thresholds to cross which we discussed earlier, and we want to cross them as soon as we possibly can. And so we must be thinking now of the ways in which we can broaden our appeal in the future, and ways in which we can appeal to people’s other instincts in a natural and healthy way consistent with our purpose.

The most important of these ways is the building of a genuine organic community. When we have not just a collection of people paying their dues each month to the Alliance, but a real community of men and women and children living together, working together, and sacrificing together for our common purpose, our shared purpose — then we will have come a long way. And it need not be an especially large community. What’s more important than numbers is the sense of community, the feeling of community. When we have that then we can put our own herd instinct to work — and it will be a much more powerful, more compelling herd instinct than that which the enemy is now manipulating; because the enemy, in order to accomplish his destructive purpose, had first to set about breaking down and undermining the already-existing sense of community in America. Before he could begin employing herd instinct to promote racial mixing, he had to destroy the basis on which herd instinct had formerly opposed that mixing. He had to destroy White solidarity. He had to turn a national and racial community into an atomized mass of individuals, and that’s exactly what he’s done.

I doubt that anyone here feels a sense of belonging to Arlington, Virginia, say, as a community — or to Washington, or Falls Church, or Silver Spring, or wherever you happen to live. That disappeared years ago, decades ago, in America — and people miss it. There are, I’m sure, a few neighborhoods left in America, ethnic neighborhoods, racially homogeneous neighborhoods — South Boston, perhaps a few other places — but the seeds of their destruction have already been sown and are growing fast. And the same is true of nearly all the various Christian churches, all the other social entities which used to provide for people the feeling of community which their souls crave. And so it will be of enormous importance to us when we have in the Alliance a real community and can offer to soul-sick Americans the sense of security, of companionship, of moral reinforcement which only belonging to an organic community can provide.

That’s what we can look forward to and that’s what we must work for now. When we have it, then we’ll not be obliged so much to buck people’s instincts — and our recruiting efforts will certainly be much, much more effective. But for now we still have to do things the hard way — and it will be slow and difficult for a while yet, and all I can say to you is that we must continue building our own consciousness and thus our strength in the ways that I’ve told you about, and we must concentrate our efforts on person-to-person recruiting — each of us, every day, in the way that I talked to you about a couple of weeks ago. And then we will have a community, and we will cross our two thresholds, and our truth will prevail.

November 7, 1976


nationalvanguard.org


Listen to the audio recording of this speech :

Les Carnets de Turner
Who we Are
Pensées sur le 4 juillet
Le port d’armes en Allemagne, 1928-1945
La mesure de la grandeur
Cosmotheism Trilogy
Out of the Darkness
Vision of a future world
Le féminisme : le grand destructeur

Hellstorm - Exposing the real genocide of Nazi Germany
The biggest cover-up in History


This documentary tells the tale that the victors still do not want you to know. Learn the terrible truth about the rape, torture, slavery, and mass murder inflicted upon the German people by the Allied victors of World Word II. This is the biggest cover-up in world history.

Thomas Goodrich - Hellstorm The death of nazi Germany
E-book

hellstormdocumentary.com





These are the quotations, along with citations, which are heard in the documentary

Terror Bombing

Winston Churchill : German cities... will be subjected to an ordeal the like of which has never been experienced by a country in continuity, severity and magnitude... To achieve this end there are no lengths of violence to which we will not go. (Garrett, Stephen A. Ethics and Airpower in World War II—The British Bombing of German Cities. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Page 31)

19-year-old Kate Hoffmeister : I struggled to run against the wind in the middle of the street... We... couldn’t go on across... because the asphalt had melted. There were people on the roadway, some already dead, some still lying alive but stuck in the asphalt. ... They were on their hands and knees screaming. (Middlebrook, Martin. The Battle of Hamburg—Allied Bomber Forces Against a German City in 1943. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1981. Pages 266–267)

Author Vera Brittain : The ruthless mass bombing of congested cities is as great a threat to the integrity of the human spirit as anything which has yet occurred on this planet... There is no military or political advantage which can justify this blasphemy. (Sorge, Martin K. The Other Price of Hitler’s War — German Military and Civilian Losses Resulting from World War II. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 1986. Page 108)

A RAF Crewman : There were people down there being fried to death in melted asphalt in the roads, they were being burnt up and we were shuffling incendiary bombs into this holocaust. I felt terribly sorry for the people in that fire I was helping to stoke up. (Garrett, Stephen A. Ethics and Airpower in World War II—The British Bombing of German Cities. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Page 82)

A Rescue Worker : Never would I have thought that death could come to so many people in so many different ways... (Some times the victims looked like ordinary people apparently peacefully sleeping; the faces of others were racked with pain, the bodies stripped almost naked by the tornado; there were wretched refugees from the East clad only in rags, and people from the Opera in all their finery; here the victim was a shapeless slab, there a layer of ashes. ... Across the city, along the streets wafted the unmistakable stench of decaying flesh. (Irving, David. The Destruction of Dresden. London: William Kimber & Co., LTD. Page 189)

A Rescue Worker : One shape I will never forget was the remains of what had apparently been a mother and child. They had shriveled and charred into one piece, and had been stuck rigidly to the asphalt. They had just been prised up. The child must have been underneath the mother, because you could still clearly see its shape, with its mother’s arms clasped around it. (Irving, David. The Destruction of Dresden. London: William Kimber & Co., LTD. Page 189)

A Red Cross Worker : I went down on my knees, trembled and cried... Several women lay there with their bellies burst open... and one could see the babies for they were hanging half outside. Many of the babies were mutilated... Scenes like that one I saw everywhere and very slowly one became numbed. One acted like a zombie. (McKee, Alexander. Dresden 1945—The Devil’s Tinderbox. New York: E.P.Dutton, 1982. Pages 252-253)

A RAF Crewman : To just fly over it without opposition felt like murder. I felt it was a cowardly war. (McKee, Alexander. Dresden 1945—The Devil’s Tinderbox. New York: E.P.Dutton, 1982. Page 66)


The Rape of Germany

A Horrified Witness: In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. ... Beyond ... stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture. In the dwellings we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead ... all murdered in a bestial manner, except only a few who had bullet holes in their necks. Some babies had their heads bashed in. In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a sofa ... half of whose head had been sheared off with an ax or a spade. (De Zayas, Alfred M. Nemesis at Potsdam : The Anglo-Americans and the Expulsions of the Germans—Background, Execution, Consequences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. Page 63)

Ilya Ehrenburg : Kill them all, men, old men, children and the women, after you have amused yourself with them! Kill. Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn. ... Break the racial pride of the German women. Take her as your legitimate booty. Kill, you brave soldiers of the victorious Soviet Army. (Lutz, Elizabeth. “Rape of Christian Europe—The Red Army’s Rampage in 1945.” The Barnes Review 3, no. 4 (Apr. 1997): 9–16.)

A Rape Victim : The Russians were coming and going the whole time and they kept eyeing us greedily. The nights were dreadful because we were never safe for a moment. The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. The youngest victim in the row houses where we lived was ten years of age and the oldest one was over seventy. .. (Kaps, Johannes, ed. The Tragedy of Silesia, 1945–46—A Documentary Account with a Special Survey of the Archdiocese of Breslau. Munich: Christ Unterwegs, 1952/53. Page 136)

A Witness from Neisse : These atrocities were not committed secretly or in hidden corners but in public, in churches, on the streets, and on the squares. ... Mothers were raped in the presence of their children, girls were raped in front of their brothers. (Kaps, Johannes, ed. The Tragedy of Silesia, 1945–46—A Documentary Account with a Special Survey of the Archdiocese of Breslau. Munich: Christ Unterwegs, 1952/53. Page 228)

German Soldier : We had never seen anything like it—utterly, unbelievably monstrous! Naked, dead women lay in many of the rooms. Swastikas had been cut into their abdomens, in some the intestines bulged out, breasts were cut up, faces beaten to a pulp and swollen puffy. Others had been tied to the furniture by their hands and feet, and massacred. A broomstick protruded from the vagina of one, a besom from that of another. ... The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. There was no mercy. ... The women we liberated were in a state almost impossible to describe. ... (Their faces had a confused, vacant look. Some were beyond speaking to, ran up and down and moaned the same sentences over and over again. Having seen the consequences of these bestial atrocities, we were terribly agitated and determined to fight. We knew the war was past winning; but it was our obligation and sacred duty to fight to the last bullet. (Testimony of “H. K.”, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany (copy in possession of the author).)


The Baltic Massacre

A Young Mother : It was so terribly cold, and the wind was like ice… the snow was falling and nothing warm to eat, no milk and nothing. I tried to give Gabi the breast, behind a house, but she didn’t take it because everything was so cold. Many women tried that, and some froze their breasts. (Thorwald, Juergen. Flight in the Winter: Russia Conquers—January to May, 1945. New York: Pantheon, 1951. Pages 48-49)

Juergen Thorwald : Every alley, every street was packed with their vehicles. People were waiting in every harbor shed, in every wind-sheltered corner. Among them stood their beasts, bleating, snorting, lowing. ... The pregnant women giving birth somewhere in a corner, on the ground, in a barracks. Some of them had been raped on their flight... and now they were trembling for fear they would give birth to a monster. The strangely pale faces of girls going up and down the streets asking for a doctor. The wounded and the sick, in constant fear they would be left behind, concealing weapons under their blankets to force someone to take them along, or to end their own lives if the Russians came. The orphans who had been saved from their asylum somewhere at the last moment and tossed onto carts with nothing around them but a blanket, and who were now lying on the floors with frozen limbs. The Russian prisoners of war, brought west under orders from above, walking on wooden soles, their tattered overcoats held together with paper strings. The old people who had lain down in some doorway at night, and had not awakened… And the wild-eyed insane ones who rushed from house to house, from wagon to wagon, crying for their mothers or their children. ... Over it all the gray sky, snow, frost, and thaw... and thaw and frost and snow, and the chill, killing wet. (Thorwald, Juergen. Flight in the Winter : Russia Conquers—January to May, 1945. New York: Pantheon, 1951. Pages 127-128)


Defeat in The West

A US Soldier : The men were deliberately wounding guards. A lot of guards were shot in the legs so they couldn’t move. They were then turned over to the inmates. One was beheaded with a bayonet. Others were ripped apart limb by limb. (Buechner, Howard A. Dachau—The Hour of the Avenger. Metairie, Louisiana : Thunderbird Press, 1986. Page 104)

Amy Schrott : They just opened up the camps and let them go. The Russians and Poles were looting the houses and killing the shopkeepers. Then they began raping the girls. (Amy Schrott Krubel interview, Jan. 9, 1997, Topeka, Kansas.)

A US Sergeant: Our own Army and the British Army ... have done their share of looting and raping... We too are considered an army of rapists. (Kelling, 61; Time Magazine, Nov. 12, 1945; Life Magazine, Jan. 7, 1946.)

A US Soldier : Hunger made German women more ‘available,’ but despite this, rape was prevalent and often accompanied by additional violence. In particular I remember an eighteen-year old woman who had the side of her face smashed with a rifle butt and was then raped by two GIs. Even the French complained that the rapes, looting and drunken destructiveness on the part of our troops was excessive. (Brech, Martin.“In ‘Eisenhower’s Death Camps’: Part I—A U.S. Prison Guard’s Story.” The Journal of Historical Review 10, no.2 (Summer 1990). Page 165.)

Two German Soldiers (combined into 1 voice over): (1) It’s incomprehensible to me how we could stand for many, many days without sitting, without lying down, just standing there, totally soaked. During the day we marched around, huddled together to try to warm each other a bit. (2) The latrines were just logs flung over ditches next to the barbed wire fences. To sleep, all we could do was to dig out a hole in the ground with our hands, then cling together in the hole. ... Because of illness, the men had to defecate on the ground. Soon, many of us were too weak to take off our trousers first. So our clothing was infected, and so was the mud where we had to walk and sit and lie down. There was no water at all at first, except the rain. ... More than half the days we had no food at all. On the rest, we got a little K ration. I could see from the package that they were giving us one tenth of the rations that they issued to their own men. ... I complained to the American camp commander that he was breaking the Geneva Convention, but he just said, “Forget the Convention. You haven’t any rights.” Within a few days, some of the men who had gone healthy into the camps were dead. I saw our men dragging many dead bodies to the gate of the camp, where they were thrown loose on top of each other onto trucks, which took them away. (Pechel, Peter, Dennis Showalter and Johannes Steinhoff. Voices From the Third Reich—
An Oral History. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway, 1989. Page 491) (Bacque, James. Other Losses — An Investigation into the Mass deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after World War II. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Co., 1989. Page 38)


The Purge

Leni Riefenstahl : Neither my husband nor my mother nor any of my three assistants had ever joined the Nazi Party, nor had any of us been politically active. No `charges had ever been filed against us, yet we were at the mercy of the Allies and had no legal protection of any kind. (Horstmann, Lali. We Chose to Stay. Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1954. Page 327)

A German Prisoner: The purpose of these interrogations is not to worm out of the people what they knew—which would be uninteresting anyway—but to extort from them special statements. The methods resorted to are extremely primitive; people are beaten up until they confess to having been members of the Nazi Party. ... The authorities simply assume that, basically, everybody has belonged to the Party. Many people die during and after these interrogations, while others, who admit at once their party membership, are treated more leniently. (Von Lehndorff, Hans Graf. Token of a Covenant — Diary of an East Prussian Surgeon, 1945–47. Chicago : Henry Regnery Co., 1964. Page 127)

Both officers who took our testimony were former German Jews. One kicked me in the back and the other hit me. ... The terrible thing was, the German men had to watch. That was a horrible, horrible experience. ... That must have been terrible for them. When I went outside, several of them stood there with tears running down their cheeks. What could they have done ? They could do nothing. (Owings, Alison. Frauen—German Women recall the Third Reich.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1994. Pages 335-336)

George Patton : Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working... I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. (Martin Blumenson, The Patton Papers—1940–1945 (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1972))

A British Witness: Some of them, one-eyed or one-legged veterans of seven or so, many so deranged by the bombing and the Russian attack that they screamed at the sight of any uniform, even a Salvation Army one. (Garrett, Stephen A. Ethics and Airpower in World War II—The British Bombing of German Cities. New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Page 141)

American Historian Ralph Franklin Keeling: While the Germans around them starve, wear rags, and live in hovels, the American aristocrats live in often unaccustomed ease and luxury. ... They live in the finest homes from which they drove the Germans; they swagger about in fine liveries and gorge themselves on diets three times as great as they allow the Germans. ... When we tell the Germans their low rations are necessary because food is so short, they naturally either think we are lying to them or regard us as inhuman for taking the lion’s share of the short supplies while they and their children starve. ([Keeling, Ralph Franklin. Gruesome Harvest — The Allies’ Postwar War Against the German People|http://www.freepdf.info/index.php?post/Keeling-Ralph-Franklin-Gruesome-harvest]. 1947. Reprint. Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1992. Page 101)


Ethnic Cleansing

Winston Churchill : Don’t mind the five or more million Germans. Stalin will see to them. You will not have trouble with them: they will cease to exist. (Keeling, Ralph Franklin. Gruesome Harvest — The Allies’ Postwar War Against the German People. 1947. Reprint. Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1992. Page 13)

A Viewer from Gruenberg: As they left town in an endless procession, Polish soldiers fell upon them, beating and flogging them in a blind rage. ... Robbed of all they possessed and literally stripped of the last of their belongings, ... these poor creatures trudged along in the wind and the rain, with no roof or shelter over their heads, not knowing where they would find a new abode. (Kaps, Johannes, ed. The Tragedy of Silesia, 1945–46—A Documentary Account with a Special Survey of the Archdiocese of Breslau. Munich: Christ Unterwegs, 1952/53. Page 428)

Austin J. App : To slice three or four ancient provinces from a country, then loot and plunder nine million people of their houses, farms, cattle, furniture, and even clothes, and then ... expel them “from the land they have inhabited for 700 years” with no distinction “between the innocent and the guilty” ... to drive them like unwanted beasts on foot to far-off provinces, unprotected, shelterless, and starving is an atrocity so vast that history records none vaster. (App, Austin J.“Mass Expulsions: ‘Tragedy on a Prodigious Scale.” The Barnes Review 2, no. 10 (Oct. 1996). Page 24)



Graphics by Oscar Turner

Der weg der NSDAP
Entstehung, Kampf und Sieg

Der Reichsführer SS





SS-Hauptamt - Der untermensch
SS-Hauptamt - Sicherung Europas
SS-Hauptamt - Sieg der Waffen Sieg des Kindes

William Luther Pierce - A lesson from Zimbabwe
William Luther Pierce - The White farmers of Zimbabwe




Zimbabwe : le président Mugabe veut chasser les Blancs hors du pays

Le Président du Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe, a déclaré vendredi que les personnes de race blanche habitant le pays, feraient bien de retourner en Angleterre, promettant par la même occasion, une redistribution des terres au bénéfice cette fois-ci de la population des Zimbabwéens de race noire.

«Les Occidentaux auraient préféré un président faible qui, espèrent-ils, autoriserait les Blancs à reprendre possession de nos terres. Cela n’arrivera pas.»

«Ils pensent pouvoir nous intimider jusqu’à ce que nous leur cédions lâchement en autorisant le retour des Blancs. Cela n’arrivera jamais.»

«Est-ce que les Blancs se rappellent où habitaient leurs ancêtres ? Les Britanniques qui habitent ici doivent par conséquent retourner chez eux en Angleterre»

«Quel est le problème ? Nous avons de nos jours des avions qui peuvent les ramener chez eux bien plus rapidement que les bateaux utilisés par leurs ancêtres»

Les coulisses de l’espionnage international

Les merveilleux exploits de James Nobody
Charles Lucieto - Le secret du Fellah N° 12


Où James Nobody est chargé à une bien singulière mission.

Soucieux, les sourcils froncés et les traits crispés par la colère, le Maréchal Lord Addendy, Haut Commissaire du Gouvernement britannique en Égypte, jeta un long coup d’oeil sur cette île de verdure qu’est Ismaïlia et qui, à mi-chemin de Port-Saïd et de Suez, aux confins imprécis de la Civilisation et de la Barbarie, semble lancer au désert, dont les sables calcinés houlent à l’horizon, un perpétuel défi.
Ici, en effet, tout scintille et tout resplendit. Là, tout n’est que silence et que mort...
Tapie au milieu de ses palmiers et de ses fleurs, qu’arrose à profusion, après avoir traversé le pays de Gessen, de biblique mémoire, l’eau du Nil, Ismaïlia, capitale de cette région si spéciale qu’on appelle le « Canal », abrite tout un monde d’ingénieurs, de contremaîtres et d’ouvriers, dont la seule raison d’être est d’entretenir et d’exploiter la grande et magnifique voie d’eau, qui raccourcit de moitié le trajet entre l’Europe et l’Asie.
De tout temps, les hommes avaient rêvé de faire communiquer entre elles ces deux mers que sont la Méditerranée et l’Océan Indien, mais, tant que n’intervint pas ce grand Français qu’était Charles de Lesseps, cette idée demeura à l’état de projet.
En effet, l’Égyptien Néko, qui vivait 600 ans avant Jésus-Christ, tenta le premier de réaliser le canal Nil—Mer Rouge. Puis, en 1671, ce fut au tour de Leibnitz d’intervenir. Chacun connaît le projet qu’il soumit à Louis XIV, et qui comportait le percement de l’isthme de Suez.
Enfin, vint Bonaparte, qui confia à l’ingénieur Lepère le soin de relier les deux mers. Mais Lepère se trompa à ce point dans ses calculs, qu’il fallut renoncer à les réaliser.
C’est en 1854 seulement que, après dix-huit ans d’études sur le terrain, Charles de Lesseps présentait au Khédive un plan rationnel qui fut adopté deux ans plus tard.
Ainsi que le dit René Vaulande dans l’admirable série d’articles qu’il vient de consacrer à l’Égypte, dans le Journal, « ce coup de pioche dans l’isthme allait avoir un retentissement politique immédiat. « De tout son pouvoir, Lord Palmerston s’opposa à l’ouverture de cette voie qui allait dévier le sens traditionnel des courants commerciaux et stratégiques, et poser, sous un jour tout nouveau, la question méditerranéenne.
« Vaines manoeuvres !
« Bientôt, il ne resta plus à l’Angleterre qu’à s’adapter à la situation de fait... et à en tirer parti. « L’achat par elle des 177.000 actions du Khédive, et son occupation de l’Égypte, firent de ce canal tellement honni un des boulevards les plus jalousement gardés de la puissance britannique. »



Pour plus d'informations